How Long Will My Rear-End Car Accident Claim Take?  
Recovering compensation for injuries and property damage resulting 
from rear-end vehicle collisions means the injured person has to prove 
1) that the other driver was at fault, and 2) the extent of the 
resulting “damages,” meaning injuries, lost income, and other losses. 
But how long will this process take?
While personal injury claims
 resulting from a rear-end collision can be resolved at almost any point
 between the time of the accident and the moment a judge or jury renders
 a verdict at the conclusion of a trial, resolution is most likely to 
occur during specific phases in the life of a claim. Let’s take a look 
at some possibilities.
Resolution Before a Lawsuit Is Filed
The rear-end car accident claims most likely to be resolved without 
ever filing a lawsuit -- that is, during “early settlement” -- include 
those in which all parties fundamentally can agree about what happened 
and the resulting damages.
This usually means that:
- injuries are minor or at least not susceptible of worsening over time
 - the claimaint did not have any pre-existing injuries that the accident is alleged to have aggravated
 - the driver who rear-ended the stopped vehicle was undisputedly the only person at fault, and
 - the at-fault driver was covered by insurance at the time of the accident.
 
This kind of “clear liability” case still must be supported by evidence of liability and damages, such as:
- written statements of eyewitnesses
 - photos of the accident scene, damage to vehicles, and injuries
 - medical reports from doctors
 - medical bills
 - estimates and/or receipts for repairs of vehicle damage, and
 - proof of lost earnings for any work absences caused by the accident.
 
In such instances, there really is nothing to argue about in court. That usually becomes clear within the first 30 to 90 days after an accident, during which time settlement would be likely.
 That means the insurance company representing the at-fault driver 
writes a settlement check to the injured person, who in turn signs a 
release giving up any future right to sue over the accident. Learn more 
about The Role of Insurance in Settling an Injury Claim.
Resolution During Discovery and Motions
After a lawsuit is filed, during the “discovery” phase of the case, 
the parties must adhere to specific timelines for gathering information 
that could be useful at trial -- that includes documents; sworn 
testimony of parties and witnesses (depositions), and written questions and answers between the parties (interrogatories).
 During this phase, disputed facts become clearer, both in terms of how 
the accident happened and the nature and extent of injuries and property
 damage actually resulting from the accident.
For example, if it turns out that the person who was rear-ended (the 
“plaintiff”) appears to have changed lanes abruptly and slammed on the 
brakes just before being rear-ended, giving the defendant’s vehicle 
insufficient time and distance to stop, that fact would suggest that the
 plaintiff may well share the fault -- or even bear complete 
responsibility -- for any resulting injuries or damages.
The discovery phase usually lasts from six to 12 months following the lawsuit’s filing.
 After the discovery process, evidence may show that the plaintiff has 
fallen short of proving facts that support the required elements of the 
case. The defendant then may seek to have the case dismissed by various 
formal motions to the court, such as a motion to dismiss or a motion for
 summary judgment. If these motions are denied (meaning the lawsuit is 
not dismissed), the defendant could become very motivated to settle 
rather than press on.
Mediation
Shortly after discovery is completed, most courts schedule the 
parties for what is called “alternative dispute resolution” (ADR) -- 
typically in the form of mediation -- to encourage them to reach a 
resolution with the help of a neutral third party. The mediator can help
 the parties understand the most likely outcome if the case goes to 
trial -- how a judge or jury probably will decide -- and manage 
expectations accordingly.
In a rear-end car accident case, a mediator can help the parties see 
how successful their arguments and evidence might be on such issues as:
- whether the plaintiff was partially at fault
 - if the plaintiff’s injuries were indeed caused by the accident
 - whether the defendant was distracted by texting and did not see the plaintiff stop
 - the fact that the road was slick from a hard rain, requiring a longer following distance to stop safely, or
 - whether the tread on the defendant’s tires was below the legally required minimum depth.